The purpose of this site is to educate & empower one another exposing the good, bad & the ugly naive patients experience with little or no plan of care at the hands of inexperienced physical therapists & interns/surgeons who often practice on patients without prior dialogue or consent. Then the patients are often ignored, minimized, mistreated & dismissed. Please share your story here where you will be heard & valued. (484) 482-3292 myhipjourney@gmail.com
Keystone PVA provides a number of services aimed at uplifting and supporting paralyzed veterans. This program provides access to health care, advocacy, and financial assistance.This program...
Sunday:Closed Monday:8:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST Tuesday:8:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST Wednesday:8:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST Thursday:8:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST Friday:8:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST Saturday:Closed
What good is this if they dont hold Doctors, Surgeons & Physical Therapists up to the light and/or allow them to lie, lie, lie? They have the power to destroy a person's Quality of life & livelihood without any accountability Thats not right but one day we will all be held accountable to God Almighty.
January 13, 2025, all applicants for health care practitioner licenses must submit a full set of fingerprints to the Pennsylvania State Police for an FBI criminal history background check as a requirement for licensure. Individuals who are already licensed in Pennsylvania will not need to complete this background check to renew their current license.
As the Department works to finalize the necessary steps to access official FBI background check results, the Bureau will temporarily continue to accept applicant-submitted FBI Identity History Summary Checks to permit applicants to complete their licensure requirements during this transitional period. FBI Identity History Summary Checks are available at https://www.fbi.gov/services/cjis/identity-history-summary-checks.
The issue of surgeon retirement age presents a significant concern within the medical community, particularly as it relates to patient safety and surgical outcomes. Research indicates that the physical and cognitive capabilities of surgeons may decline with age, leading to potential risks in surgical performance. The rapid advancements in medical education and technology further exacerbate this issue, as older surgeons may find themselves increasingly disconnected from the latest practices and techniques in their field. The absence of a federally mandated retirement age in the United States compounds the problem, allowing surgeons to continue operating despite evidence suggesting a decline in their abilities.
Anecdotal evidence, alongside objective assessments, highlights the reluctance of many surgeons to retire, often due to personal attachment to their profession or financial considerations. This reluctance poses a substantial risk to patient safety, as the cumulative effects of aging can lead to increased complications during surgery. The medical community must confront this uncomfortable reality and establish clearer guidelines regarding the retirement of surgeons, ensuring that patient welfare remains the paramount concern.
In light of these challenges, it is imperative that hospitals and medical institutions take proactive measures to evaluate the performance of aging surgeons. Regular assessments should be instituted to monitor both physical and cognitive capabilities, thereby ensuring that surgical teams are composed of individuals who can meet the demands of modern surgical practices.
Failure to address this issue not only jeopardizes patient safety but also undermines the integrity of the surgical profession as a whole. It is essential for the medical system to engage in this critical discourse and implement necessary changes to safeguard the future of surgical care for every patient not just some.
Being highly skilled without compassion in the medical field is not enough. While technical expertise is crucial, it is equally important to have empathy and compassion for patients. Without these qualities, healthcare professionals risk providing subpar care and failing to meet the emotional needs of their patients. Research has shown that compassionate care leads to better patient outcomes, increased patient satisfaction, and improved overall healthcare experiences. Therefore, it is imperative that medical professionals prioritize both their technical skills and their ability to empathize with and support their patients.
Patients who receive care from healthcare professionals lacking in compassion often report feeling neglected, unheard, and dehumanized. This can have detrimental effects on their mental and emotional well-being, exacerbating their physical health conditions. In contrast, healthcare providers who demonstrate compassion are more likely to establish trust and rapport with their patients, leading to improved patient compliance, better treatment outcomes, and increased patient satisfaction. Moreover, compassionate care has been shown to reduce patient anxiety, enhance pain management, and even contribute to faster recovery times.
In conclusion, being highly skilled without compassion in the medical field is simply not enough. Healthcare professionals must recognize the importance of empathy and compassion in their practice. By prioritizing these qualities alongside their technical expertise, they can provide holistic care that addresses both the physical and emotional needs of their patients. It is essential that medical education and training programs emphasize the development of compassionate skills to ensure that future healthcare professionals are equipped to provide the highest quality of care to their patients.
There is a growing trend in the orthopedic industry & that is issue of total & up-front transparency regarding the benefits along with the potential hazards associated with hip and knee implants.
It is of paramount importance. patients often place their trust in the white lab coat peoples recommendations of healthcare professionals and the FDA.
Moreover, the reliance on manufacturers to provide safety data raises significant doubts about the integrity of the information presented to both doctors and patients. The financial incentives that exist within the industry can create an environment where the potential risks of these implants are downplayed or obscured. This lack of accountability is troubling, as it undermines the trust that patients place in their healthcare providers. It is imperative that patients receive comprehensive, unfiltered information about the risks associated with the variety of hip and knee implants to make informed decisions about their treatment options.
In light of these concerns, it is essential to advocate for greater transparency and independent research into the safety of hip and knee implants. The current state of affairs, where vested interests may compromise patient safety, is unacceptable.
Patients deserve to be fully informed about the potential hazards of the devices & methods performed & how many of these procedures they have done prior to operating on you. Let's face it some Doctors may receive kickbacks from various manufacturers & makes them free bias to the procedures & prosthetics used on you. Until significant changes are made in how information is shared and regulated, the outlook remains nebulous at best and patients will continue to face undue risks in their pursuit of relief from pain and mobility issues. Here is a list of 10 things that can possibly go wrong: #1 leg length discrepancies #2 infections because of not properly followed basic protocols to clean & maintain sterile implements. #3 ambulisomes in the blood and heart which recently happened with Dr David Nazarian failing to follow basic protocols with a recent knee replacement failing Nazarian was trained by the infamous University of Penn but now Dr Nazarian operates under the tutelage of Rothman Orthopedics Specialty Hospital & Thomas Jefferson Health Systems The family lost their beloved Mother which no amount of money can compensate such a catastrophic outcome & loss @ the hands of total negligence and incompetence.
Hello to whoever is reading this i just want to send well wishes and raise your awareness to what you are going to be facing when approaching hip or knee surgery
Being heard and valued as an orthopedic patient is paramount, particularly in the context of hip or knee replacement procedures. Prior to surgery, patients must engage in open dialogues with their healthcare providers to articulate their concerns, expectations, and medical histories. This communication fosters a collaborative environment, ensuring that treatment plans are tailored to individual needs. It is essential for patients to voice their preferences regarding pain management and rehabilitation strategies, as these discussions can significantly influence postoperative outcomes and overall satisfaction with the surgical experience.
During the surgical process, patients must feel assured that their voices continue to hold weight. An effective orthopedic team will prioritize patient education, clearly explaining the surgical procedure, potential risks, and expected recovery trajectories. This transparency not only alleviates anxiety but also empowers patients to take an active role in their care. It is crucial for patients to ask questions and seek clarification about any aspect of their treatment to ensure they fully understand the process and can make informed decisions regarding their health.
Post-surgery, the value of being heard and valued persists as patients navigate their recovery journey. Regular follow-up appointments provide opportunities for patients to report their progress, express any concerns, and adjust rehabilitation protocols as necessary. It is imperative that healthcare providers remain receptive to patient feedback during this phase, as it can lead to modifications in care that enhance recovery and quality of life. Patients should actively participate in their rehabilitation, advocating for their needs and preferences, which ultimately contributes to a more favorable outcome and a sense of empowerment in their healthcare experience.
Taking legal action against a hospital or Doctor might feel hopeless at times. Remember that hospitals & Doctors are responsible for providing safe care, and if negligence caused your loved one's death or if you suspect negligence or any treatment or medical care below the standard of care before, during or after hip, knee and/or back and any & all Medical and/or Orthopedic procedures you really deserve answers.
Jury Returns $2.5M Award Against Rothman Specialty Hospital & Dr. DAVID NAZARIAN, M.D. for Failing to Prevent Blood Clot After Surgery :: MALPRACTICE :: NEGLIGENCE :: DEATH
DAVID NAZARIAN, M.D. in a wrongful death lawsuit, discovering the Clinical Team NEGLIGENT in failing to properly treat a patient following hip surgery with David Nazarian.
Jury Returns $2.5M Award Against Health Care Providers for Allegedly Failing to Prevent Blood Clot After Surgery
"I am extremely happy for the family of Mrs. Koesterer. The verdict vindicated their feelings that the life of their mother, who was age 86, was worth more them a nominal sum. It seems to dispel the insurance industry myth that the life of an elderly person is minimal and confirms that no matter the age, all lives are precious," said the plaintiff's attorney, Thomas Sacchetta of Sacchetta & Baldino.
Correction: The article incorrectly stated the verdict was against Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. The verdict was only against Rothman Orthopaedics & Dr. David Nazarian.
A Philadelphia jury returneda $2.5 million verdict against Rothman Orthopaedics & DAVID NAZARIAN, M.D.in a wrongful death suit, finding the Clinical Team NEGLIGENT in failing to properly treat an elderly patient following hip surgery,which led to a lower left extremity deep vein thrombosis and a pulmonary embolism.
The case, Koesterer v. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, was tried for three days before Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Gwendolyn N. Bright, with the suit stemming from the death of Virginia Koesterer, after she suffered a massive venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Koesterer's estate alleged her death was the result of negligence on behalf of numerous health care workers and health care facilities, claiming her VTE originated from a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) formed during or soon after her hip surgery the morning before.
Daniel Koesterer, as executor of Koesterer's estate, sued defendants Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Thomas Jefferson University Physicians, Jefferson Health, Jefferson Health System, Reconstructive Orthopaedic Associates II, Reconstructive Orthopaedic Associates II, and Dr. David Nazarian. At trial against the Reconstructive Orthpaedic defendants and David Nazarian, he claimed the defendants failed to properly treat Koesterer for her increased rise of venous thromboembolism development, which he claimed was a breach in the standard of care.
A comprehensive review of the body of law upon which wrongful use litigation is built, based and written upon years of experience and a close study of the jurisprudence.
"I am extremely happy for the family of Mrs. Koesterer. The verdict vindicated their feelings that the life of their mother, who was age 86, was worth more them a nominal sum. It seems to dispel the insurance industry myth that the life of an elderly person is minimal and confirms that no matter the age, all lives are precious," said Koesterer's attorney, Thomas Sacchetta of Sacchetta & Baldino. "The carrier only valued Mrs. Koesterer life at nuisance value. The jury in our case took their job seriously, considered all the evidence, and delivered a fair verdict based on all the evidence."
According to the plaintiff's pretrial memorandum, Koesterer "clearly had a significant past medical history with known increased risk of development of venous thromboembolism," yet all of her anticoagulation medications were stopped before her left total hip arthroplasty.
The plaintiff alleged that Koesterer wasn't adequately mobilized during her postoperative period, and that her blood pressure wasn't adequately maintained, despite the acknowledgment that it should be. Sacchetta claims her orthopedic providers were made aware of her hypotensive episodes.
"This combination of lack of adequate care was a breach in the standard of care and led to the development of Ms. Koesterer's left lower extremity DVT, which ultimately led to a PE that caused her death. Had the standard of care been met, by adequately caring for Ms. Koesterer with maintenance of her aspirin, a bridging anticoagulation therapy, appropriate mobilization, and/or maintenance of her blood pressure to prevent hypotension, Ms. Koesterer would not have developed a left lower extremity DVT that led to a PE and her death," the plaintiff argued in the filing.
The memo further alleged that NAZARIAN failed "to follow the cardiology recommendation of aspirin immediately following surgery," and that this was a breach of the standard of care and "increased the risk of harm to Ms. Koesterer contributing to her death." The hospital, Thomas Jefferson University Physicians, and Thomas Jefferson Health Systems "violated their duty to Ms. Koesterer to ensure her safety and well being while under their care," by failing "to properly oversee all medical providers to ensure that patients safety and that proper medical care was provided," according to the memo.
"Additionally they failed to formulate, adopt, and enforce adequate rules and policies to ensure that quality care for patients including Ms. Koesterer by failing to have proper policies and enforce said policies as is relates to anticoagulation. The breaches of care by the hospital with regard to their failure to enforce the policies and to oversee the medical personnel was a direct violation of the standard of care and caused and increased the risk of harm to Ms. Koesterer thereby causing her death," the plaintiff's filing said.
Defendants, Nazarian, Reconstructive Orthopaedic Associates II, and Reconstructive Orthopaedic Associates II, argued in their pretrial memo that the plaintiff's claims were without merit and denied all allegations of negligence.
According to the defendants, Koesterer was admitted to the hospital for a planned hip replacement by Nazarian. Approximately 1,000 units of heparin were administered intraoperatively, and after the procedures, and Nazarian ordered a 2 mg tablet of warfarin, and entered an order for 2.5 mg warfarin tablets to be given to her once a day.
Koesterer was later seen by Dr. Kenneth Rosenberg at the request of Nazarian. Rosenberg noted that Koesterer "had permanent atrial fibrillation on warfarin with a controlled rate of diltiazem and recommended continuing it unless her systolic went under 100," that the Jefferson Antithrombotic Service (JATS) was following Koesterer for warfarin management, and that Koesterer was on Plavix, which "Dr. Rosenberg felt that aspirin was acceptable for a few days for DVT prevention," according to the defendants.
According to the memo, the morning of Sept. 19, 2019, it was noted that Koesterer denied chest pain, shortness of breath, and bleeding, and that Dr. Taki Galanis planned to start warfarin 2.5 mg that evening and check Koesterer's internal normalized ratio the following day. Galanis also noted that bilateral compression devices were to be continued.
The defendants claim that the cardiology and orthopedic surgery teams were working on plans for antiplatelet resumption, and that the present plan for Koesterer was to continue the current dose of warfarin the evening she died. According to the memo, Koesterer became hypotensive that night, and was later found in ventricular fibrillation and declared dead.
Marcie A. Courtney, a principal at Post & Schell, represented Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Jefferson University Physicians, Jefferson Health, and Jefferson Health System.
Marshall L. Schwartz, a partner at O'Brien & Ryan, served as counsel for the defendants Nazarian, Reconstructive Orthopaedic Associates II, and Reconstructive Orthopaedic Associates II.
Neither attorney immediately responded to messages seeking comment.
